logotype
  • Home
  • About
  • Civil Service Mentor
  • Author
  • Speaker
  • Books
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Gallery
    • Picture Gallery
    • Video Gallery
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Civil Service Mentor
  • Author
  • Speaker
  • Books
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Gallery
    • Picture Gallery
    • Video Gallery
  • Contact
logotype
logotype
  • Home
  • About
  • Civil Service Mentor
  • Author
  • Speaker
  • Books
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Gallery
    • Picture Gallery
    • Video Gallery
  • Contact
Blog Post
20 Oct
The Millenium PostBy ALOK RANJAN
3 Likes

The writing is on the wall

The red flags raised by the GHI report regarding malnutrition in India are indeed concerning, and deserve acknowledgement rather than denial

The latest global hunger index report has been released, and India has been ranked 107th out of 121 countries. This has once again stirred a controversy, with the Indian government protesting and responding by summarily rejecting the report and claiming that this is a part of a consistent effort to taint India’s image. The global hunger index gives the impression that it is about shortage of food and a large number of people going hungry. This is definitely not the state of affairs in India where we have achieved food security, and there is no one who is remaining hungry for want of food. However, the GHI is a multidimensional index of hunger, which makes it much more complex. Its four measures are child mortality under five years, child wasting, child stunting and under nourishment. These measures have been used ever since the inception of this index in 2006. It is not as if some new measures have been used to obtain the current ranking.

The Indian side argues that this analysis is based on inadequate data. Proper data regarding these measures is often not properly computed or presented by various states of the country and, as such, the GHI relies upon some kind of an approximation or projection of incomplete data. It has also been argued that in order to calculate the index, the GHI has been selective and discretionary in terms of using the data. Essentially, the issue is about unreliable data being used. In a similar vein, India reacted to its low score in the human development index (HDI) as well. It alleged that data regarding the deaths during the pandemic, where excess death figures were used to calculate life expectancy, were incorrect. However, GHI or HDI are not India-specific surveys. The GHI website has clearly stated that its findings are based on data officially reported by the member countries, including India.

The GHI report should come as a shock to us when we realise the extent of malnourishment prevailing among children in our country. Reacting to similar findings in 2012, the then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had acknowledged that such a high level of malnutrition was a matter of national shame. The GHI index considers child mortality as the percentage of children who die before reaching the age of five, due to inadequate nutrition or disease. Data show that India has 3.3 per cent under-five mortality rate, which is higher than Bangladesh at 2.9 per cent, Indonesia at 2.3 per cent and China at 0.7 per cent. Of course, we are better than Pakistan which is at 6.5 per cent.

The second indicator considered by the GHI is the proportion of people who are undernourished in the population. India fares quite poorly at 16.3 per cent, which is much higher than Bangladesh at 11.4 whereas China is less than 2.5 per cent. Similarly, India performs badly along the indicators of stunting and wasting of children of less than five years age. As many as 35.5 per cent of children in India are suffering from stunting (children under five who have low height for their age, resulting from undernourishment), which is extremely high. This indicator accounts for 1/6th of the GHI score. Similarly, 19.3 per cent of under-five Indian children suffer from wasting, which is much higher than the figure of 9.8 per cent for Bangladesh and 1.9 per cent for China. Even Pakistan scores better at 6.5 per cent. The weightage assigned to wasting is 1/6th of GHI score. The overall score is 100, and the lower a country scores the better its performance.

The Government of India has rightly pointed out that three out of these four variables relate to children and, hence, cannot be taken as an indicator of the entire population. There is merit in this argument but it is also true that India is facing a crisis of undernourishment, particularly among children, which is indeed a matter of great concern for policymakers. The government has started a Poshan (nourishment) Abhiyan but a lot of work still needs to be done. States like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar are particularly vulnerable. We have to take urgent steps to eradicate malnutrition among children, which would need maintaining real-time data of the weight and height of children and targeting government schemes to take them out of this sorry state of affairs. Rather than spending time on finding ways of being critical of the GHI, the Central and state governments must accord the highest priority to this issue. Lately, another international report has come, which shows that between 2004-05 and 2019-20, India was able to take 41 crore people out of poverty, which is a major achievement, and shows that with the right kind of leadership and political will, it is possible to free the children of our country from the scourge of stunting and wasting.

The infant mortality figures indicate that a lot needs to be done to improve healthcare facilities, especially in the rural areas. We are spending only 1.2 per cent of our GDP on healthcare, which has to be raised to 2.5 per cent at the earliest. Moreover, healthcare has to be attended to in a holistic manner by synergizing between the schemes related to health, nutrition, water, sanitation and education.

We may concede that the term GHI does give rise to an erroneous perception about hunger. It would be better if this indicator could be called the global nutrition index. But then, as it is said, what’s in a name? The stark reality is before us and denial is not the right response. The problem of under-nourishment has to be understood, accepted and a frontal attack needs to be launched to free the country of this menace.

The writer is an ex-Chief Secretary, Govt of Uttar Pradesh. Views expressed are personal

Share article:TelegramWhatsappTwitterFacebookPinterestLinkedin
In formative phase

In formative phase

October 10, 2022

A necessary rejig

November 28, 2022
A necessary rejig

Related Posts

24 Jun
The Millenium PostBy Alok Ranjan0 Comments

Travails of policy rollout

READ MORE
31 Mar
The Millenium PostBy Alok Ranjan0 Comments

A flawed framework

READ MORE

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Dealing with a distress
  • Leading the change
  • Micro-model of governance
  • Opportunity with challenges
  • Grandeur with quality

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020

Categories

  • ET Government
  • Penguin
  • The Millenium Post
  • The Pioneer
  • Uncategorized
Author
Featured author image: The writing is on the wall

Mr. Alok Ranjan

Categories
  • ET Government2
  • Penguin3
  • The Millenium Post42
  • The Pioneer3
  • Uncategorized1
Recent Posts
  • Dealing with a distress
    Dealing with a distress
    March 20, 2023
  • Micro-model of governance
    Micro-model of governance
    February 9, 2023
  • Opportunity with challenges
    Opportunity with challenges
    January 23, 2023
Tags
Administration Agnipath Agniveer Alok Ranjan Annual Performance Author Talks Awareness CAT Civil Society Coaching Culture Continuous Evaluation Covid 19 CUET Economic Reforms Educational Reforms Effective Communication eGovernance Employment Policy Equality Girl Education Good Governance Government Employee Government of India Government Schemes IAS IAS As a Career IAS Aspirants IIT Infrastructure JEE Making A Difference Pension Scheme Policy 2021-30 Privatization Protests Reforms School Education Trillion Dollar Hopes UG Admissions Union Budget UP Board UP Government UPSc Up Skilling Uttar Pradesh
Find us on Facebook
Facebook
 
logotype
 

An ace administrator, thought provoking author and a distinguished public speaker, Mr. Alok Ranjan has retired as the Chief Secretary of Uttar Pradesh (Executive head of the state).

 
TwitterYoutube-pLinkedin-inLinkedin-inLinkedin-in
 

Contacts

 
 
 

Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh

 
 
 

ranjanalok.ias@gmail.com

 
 
 

+91- 9839 690 606

 

IMPORTANT LINK

 
Order book with Amazon Order book with Flipkart Get a Consultation Contact Gallery
 

Latest news

 
  • Inclusive growth
    December 23, 2021
  • Opinion: Making a difference with IAS as a career
    December 23, 2021
 
 

Terms of use

 

Privacy Environmental Policy

Copyright ©2021 All rights reserved | Designed & developed by [Content] Culture.
 
  • ORDER BOOK WITH AMAZON
  • ORDER BOOK WITH FLIPKART
  • BOOK A CONSULTATION