logotype
  • Home
  • About
  • Civil Service Mentor
  • Author
  • Speaker
  • Books
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Gallery
    • Picture Gallery
    • Video Gallery
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Civil Service Mentor
  • Author
  • Speaker
  • Books
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Gallery
    • Picture Gallery
    • Video Gallery
  • Contact
logotype
logotype
  • Home
  • About
  • Civil Service Mentor
  • Author
  • Speaker
  • Books
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Gallery
    • Picture Gallery
    • Video Gallery
  • Contact
Blog Post
30 May
The Millenium PostBy Alok Ranjan
4 Likes

Need for innovative solutions

In the backdrop of insufficient piecemeal governance reform attempts of the past, the pandemic offers an opportune time for a more holistic framework

I am a great admirer of the writings of Gurcharan Das and rate his work “The difficulty of being good” as outstanding. He is a liberal thinker who believes that a business environment should be free of unnecessary government controls and regulations. I enjoyed reading his piece in the Times of India a day before, where he spoke about the imperative of the Central Government honouring its commitment of minimum government and maximum governance. He emphasized the need for structural reforms in the bureaucratic system to enable it to respond adequately to extraordinary situations like the current pandemic. I fully agree with him that instead of piecemeal dabbling like the half-baked lateral entry into the government, or privatization of some public sector corporations, the government must focus on systemic reforms.

Unfortunately, whenever there is a discussion on governance reforms, people tend to focus almost entirely on the civil services, particularly IAS. It almost appears as if the root cause of the system not delivering is the existence of a service like the IAS. My first take on this is that IAS is only a small part of the government machinery. Several Central services, state services, secretarial services and even technical services form the bulk of the government servants. If we feel that the government is not responding promptly to the governance challenges of the 21st century, including the response to the pandemic, the problem is not with any one service but the entire government machinery and its working culture. The second wave has indeed found the bureaucracy wanting in its response. Things like availability of oxygen, ICU beds and provisioning of medicines are issues that could have been handled much better. The entire government, including the political executive and civil servants, along with doctors and experts could not assess the severity of the second wave and even dismantled many of the arrangements made during the first wave, leading to an unmitigated disaster with people dying not because of the disease but due to lacking life-saving facilities. Even the care, concern and compassion expected in the crisis were absent. It was almost as if the government system abdicated and left the people to fend for themselves. It became a question of survival of the fittest. There is no doubt that many people rose to the occasion and volunteered to provide help to the needy. This has been captured very well in the recent edition of India Today which featured courageous and committed efforts of good samaritans. I must also point out that the doctors and the health workers did a tremendous job and many of them attained martyrdom in the process. There are also encouraging stories of IAS officers like the Mumbai Municipal Commissioner, Iqbal Singh Chahal who have distinguished themselves by leading from the front.

Major structural reforms always come as a response to a crisis. For years, we have been talking about the unsatisfactory level of public service delivery and the need for administrative reforms. The recommendations of two administrative reforms commissions have been implemented to improve the working of the government but that hasn’t sufficed. Some of the bolder recommendations were not favoured by the government which did not find those practical or implementable. The pandemic has allowed us to go for major governance reforms to enable a responsive, prompt, effective as well as a result-oriented bureaucracy.

In the recent past, lateral entry has been tried as a reform measure but it seems to be based on a wrong diagnosis of the problem; also, its implementation hasn’t been result-oriented. For instance, at the Joint Secretary level, ten people were selected of which only nine have joined who seemingly lack special domain expertise. A lateral entry system should identify specific areas and domains for which people having exemplary expertise could be selected, with clearly laid out expectations from them. Lateral entry would yield results if it creates an environment where genuine experts of great calibre join the government. Whenever people talk of lateral entry, they mention Manmohan Singh, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, Vijay Kelkar or Raghuram Rajan. However, the present system is not bringing in any such luminaries into the system. I feel the current half-hearted effort would create more problems than providing solutions. Similarly, there was a suggestion to make civil servants focus on training by allotting them a service after adding marks obtained in the training academy. This would obviously lead to vitiating the merit-based system of selection and bring in personal bias which would erode the credibility of the civil services. These are two illustrations to show how governance reforms should not be attempted.

The basic reform, in my opinion, must relate to evolving a fair, transparent and scientific performance evaluation system that would enable only the best civil servants to reach the top. The Government of India has implemented a 360-degree evaluation system whereby only about 30 per cent of the officers in a particular IAS batch reach the level of Secretary to the Government of India. The promotion is no longer automatic and seniority-based but is a reflection of merit and integrity. However, most officers still find the system opaque; it definitely needs improvement. Performance is always related to reward and punishment and having the right person at the right place. The biggest government reform would be to have such a performance evaluation system in place which would incentivize those officers who deliver results and constantly acquire new knowledge. From the level of the joint secretary, domain specialization should be encouraged in broad areas like the social sector, infrastructure and finance. A civil servant has to ensure that the government does not work in silos, therefore, a very narrow specialization would run counter to the need for good governance. A multidisciplinary approach is required at the top level even in the private sector.

The most important thing is to change the working system in a manner that officers are accountable for giving results and the system should encourage prompt decision-making and visionary thinking. The civil servant should be able to work and take decisions fearlessly without the sword of CAG, CBI, CVC and the courts hanging over his head. The system should enable the entire bureaucracy to function professionally. Political intervention is necessary in a democracy but political interference, which has eaten away the vitals of bureaucracy like a termite, has to be removed. The government should not, and cannot, function as a private sector organization but there is no reason why it cannot have a work culture of efficiency and effectiveness. A complete re-engineering of government processes, procedures, rules, regulations and systems is required to enable result-oriented decision-making and leadership. Innovative models of governance, including the setting up of autonomous and accountable executing agencies, are required. Various programmes would need to be implemented in a mission mode. There is a need for a broader framework for structural reforms in governance. Piecemeal interventions and incremental reforms would not help. A major re-imagination of governance is required.


Click to read original article.

Share article:TelegramWhatsappTwitterFacebookPinterestLinkedin
Alok Ranjan Covid 19 Economic Reforms Holistic Framework IAS Making A Difference Reforms
Expanding the base

Expanding the base

May 3, 2021

Measures for revival

June 18, 2021
Measures for revival

Related Posts

20 Sep
The Millenium PostBy Alok Ranjan0 Comments

Far too ambitious?

READ MORE
16 Dec
The Millenium PostBy Alok Ranjan0 Comments

Communicating farm reforms

READ MORE

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Dealing with a distress
  • Leading the change
  • Micro-model of governance
  • Opportunity with challenges
  • Grandeur with quality

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020

Categories

  • ET Government
  • Penguin
  • The Millenium Post
  • The Pioneer
  • Uncategorized
Author
Featured author image: Need for innovative solutions

Mr. Alok Ranjan

Categories
  • ET Government2
  • Penguin3
  • The Millenium Post42
  • The Pioneer3
  • Uncategorized1
Recent Posts
  • Dealing with a distress
    Dealing with a distress
    March 20, 2023
  • Micro-model of governance
    Micro-model of governance
    February 9, 2023
  • Opportunity with challenges
    Opportunity with challenges
    January 23, 2023
Tags
Administration Agnipath Agniveer Alok Ranjan Annual Performance Author Talks Awareness CAT Civil Society Coaching Culture Continuous Evaluation Covid 19 CUET Economic Reforms Educational Reforms Effective Communication eGovernance Employment Policy Equality Girl Education Good Governance Government Employee Government of India Government Schemes IAS IAS As a Career IAS Aspirants IIT Infrastructure JEE Making A Difference Pension Scheme Policy 2021-30 Privatization Protests Reforms School Education Trillion Dollar Hopes UG Admissions Union Budget UP Board UP Government UPSc Up Skilling Uttar Pradesh
Find us on Facebook
Facebook
 
logotype
 

An ace administrator, thought provoking author and a distinguished public speaker, Mr. Alok Ranjan has retired as the Chief Secretary of Uttar Pradesh (Executive head of the state).

 
TwitterYoutube-pLinkedin-inLinkedin-inLinkedin-in
 

Contacts

 
 
 

Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh

 
 
 

ranjanalok.ias@gmail.com

 
 
 

+91- 9839 690 606

 

IMPORTANT LINK

 
Order book with Amazon Order book with Flipkart Get a Consultation Contact Gallery
 

Latest news

 
  • Inclusive growth
    December 23, 2021
  • Opinion: Making a difference with IAS as a career
    December 23, 2021
 
 

Terms of use

 

Privacy Environmental Policy

Copyright ©2021 All rights reserved | Designed & developed by [Content] Culture.
 
  • ORDER BOOK WITH AMAZON
  • ORDER BOOK WITH FLIPKART
  • BOOK A CONSULTATION